An example of transaction reporting exception remediation as a governed process: agents do the 9 steps, and a person signs 2 gates before anything irreversible happens. Download it, import it into your workspace, and adapt it to your systems.
Firms generate 100K-2M+ rejected, late or paired-but-unmatched MiFIR/EMIR/CFTC transaction reports a year, and analysts hand-triage each NACK, hunt the root cause across the OMS, reference-data and the ARM/TR feed, then manually re-key and backload corrections. The work is slow, error-prone and breaks SLA windows, exposing the firm to escalating regulatory fines and remediation programmes for persistent under/over-reporting. Agents triage every exception, root-cause it against the regulator's validation rules and reference data, draft deterministic field-level repairs and backloaded corrections, and stage the corrected batch — clearing the routine, rule-grounded cases automatically. Only the regulator-facing irreversible actions reach a human: a licensed officer signs off the corrected batch before resubmission and approves any material under/over-reporting self-disclosure to the FCA/ESMA/CFTC.
The governed flow · branches, parallel work & a human on the irreversible step
Pull rejected, late and unmatched MiFIR/EMIR/CFTC transaction reports plus the ARM/TR NACK/feedback files
agent · low risk
Root-cause each exception by classifying the rejection against the regulator's validation rule set, ESMA CFUP rules and the firm's LEI/ANNA reference data
agent · medium risk
Draft deterministic field-level repairs and the backloaded correction batch (CON/NEWT/AMND), validating each fix against the rule engine without submitting
decision
Repair confidence?
agent · low risk
Routine, rule-grounded case: auto-clear the deterministic repair against the validated rule set and stage the clean corrected batch — a reversible in-policy fix
agent · medium risk
Ambiguous / high-value case: stage the corrected batch with the root-cause rationale, residual rule-engine warnings and a draft repair narrative for officer review
gate · human sign-off
A licensed reporting officer reviews and signs off the corrected batch before resubmission — or sends it back for re-repairsigns: Licensed reporting / compliance officer (SMF16/SMF17)
agent · high riskirreversible
Resubmit the signed-off corrected and backloaded batch to the ARM / Trade Repository / regulator endpoint
agent · low risk
Track ACK/NACK on the resubmitted batch, confirm pairing/matching, monitor SLA windows and assess the corrected population for material under/over-reporting
decision
Material under/over-reporting?
agent · medium risk
Material breach: draft the under/over-reporting self-disclosure pack with the impacted population, root cause and remediation timeline
gate · human sign-off
A licensed reporting officer approves the material self-disclosure before it is filed with the FCA/ESMA/CFTC — or sends it back for revisionsigns: Licensed reporting / compliance officer (SMF16/SMF17)
agent · high riskirreversible
File the approved self-disclosure notification with the FCA/ESMA/CFTC via the supervisory portal
Done
low riskmedium riskhigh riskbranch / reworkgate · human sign-off
Use this example
01
Download the file
A minctrl.process/v1 document: the graph and the hash of the process it becomes.
02
Import it in Processes
Import into Minctrl opens this example in your workspace; one click stores it as your first version. Import JSON does the same with the file, and a file changed after download is refused.
03
Connect your systems
Every connector starts in shadow: steps run, nothing leaves Minctrl until you configure a connector and switch it live.
04
Adapt it
Change signers, time limits and steps on the canvas. Each save is a new version; a running case stays on the version it started with.
Questions
How do I automate transaction reporting exception remediation with Minctrl?+
Start from this example. Import the file in Processes, connect your own systems, and adapt the steps on the canvas. Agents run the reversible steps; every irreversible step waits at a gate for the role you choose. The example has 9 steps and 2 gates; you can change any of them.
Is transaction reporting exception remediation in Minctrl auditable?+
Every run start, signature and change to the process is written to a hash-chained audit log your auditor can verify and export. The example is modelled on MiFIR/EMIR; whether your process meets it is a decision for your compliance team.
Does the AI decide everything?+
No. Minctrl will not make a process runnable while an irreversible step can be reached without a human gate, and one person cannot sign two gates of the same run.