Example processfintechMiFIR/EMIR

Transaction reporting exception remediation automation software

An example of transaction reporting exception remediation as a governed process: agents do the 9 steps, and a person signs 2 gates before anything irreversible happens. Download it, import it into your workspace, and adapt it to your systems.

Download example · JSONImport into Minctrl →

minctrl.process/v1 · hash fd27b72e6448…94b3

The graph9 agent steps2 human gatessigns: Licensed reporting / compliance officer (SMF16/SMF17 or equivalent)

Transaction-reporting exception remediation autopilot

Firms generate 100K-2M+ rejected, late or paired-but-unmatched MiFIR/EMIR/CFTC transaction reports a year, and analysts hand-triage each NACK, hunt the root cause across the OMS, reference-data and the ARM/TR feed, then manually re-key and backload corrections. The work is slow, error-prone and breaks SLA windows, exposing the firm to escalating regulatory fines and remediation programmes for persistent under/over-reporting. Agents triage every exception, root-cause it against the regulator's validation rules and reference data, draft deterministic field-level repairs and backloaded corrections, and stage the corrected batch — clearing the routine, rule-grounded cases automatically. Only the regulator-facing irreversible actions reach a human: a licensed officer signs off the corrected batch before resubmission and approves any material under/over-reporting self-disclosure to the FCA/ESMA/CFTC.

The governed flow · branches, parallel work & a human on the irreversible step
routine — rule-grounded, deterministic fixambiguous / high-value — needs officer judgementrejected — re-repair requiredbatch signed offimmaterial but residual exceptions — re-openmaterial under/over-reportingrejected — revise disclosure packdisclosure approved
Start
agent · low risk
Pull rejected, late and unmatched MiFIR/EMIR/CFTC transaction reports plus the ARM/TR NACK/feedback files
agent · low risk
Root-cause each exception by classifying the rejection against the regulator's validation rule set, ESMA CFUP rules and the firm's LEI/ANNA reference data
agent · medium risk
Draft deterministic field-level repairs and the backloaded correction batch (CON/NEWT/AMND), validating each fix against the rule engine without submitting
decision
Repair confidence?
agent · low risk
Routine, rule-grounded case: auto-clear the deterministic repair against the validated rule set and stage the clean corrected batch — a reversible in-policy fix
agent · medium risk
Ambiguous / high-value case: stage the corrected batch with the root-cause rationale, residual rule-engine warnings and a draft repair narrative for officer review
gate · human sign-off
A licensed reporting officer reviews and signs off the corrected batch before resubmission — or sends it back for re-repairsigns: Licensed reporting / compliance officer (SMF16/SMF17)
agent · high riskirreversible
Resubmit the signed-off corrected and backloaded batch to the ARM / Trade Repository / regulator endpoint
agent · low risk
Track ACK/NACK on the resubmitted batch, confirm pairing/matching, monitor SLA windows and assess the corrected population for material under/over-reporting
decision
Material under/over-reporting?
agent · medium risk
Material breach: draft the under/over-reporting self-disclosure pack with the impacted population, root cause and remediation timeline
gate · human sign-off
A licensed reporting officer approves the material self-disclosure before it is filed with the FCA/ESMA/CFTC — or sends it back for revisionsigns: Licensed reporting / compliance officer (SMF16/SMF17)
agent · high riskirreversible
File the approved self-disclosure notification with the FCA/ESMA/CFTC via the supervisory portal
Done
low riskmedium riskhigh riskbranch / reworkgate · human sign-off
Use this example
01

Download the file

A minctrl.process/v1 document: the graph and the hash of the process it becomes.

02

Import it in Processes

Import into Minctrl opens this example in your workspace; one click stores it as your first version. Import JSON does the same with the file, and a file changed after download is refused.

03

Connect your systems

Every connector starts in shadow: steps run, nothing leaves Minctrl until you configure a connector and switch it live.

04

Adapt it

Change signers, time limits and steps on the canvas. Each save is a new version; a running case stays on the version it started with.

Questions
How do I automate transaction reporting exception remediation with Minctrl?

Start from this example. Import the file in Processes, connect your own systems, and adapt the steps on the canvas. Agents run the reversible steps; every irreversible step waits at a gate for the role you choose. The example has 9 steps and 2 gates; you can change any of them.

Is transaction reporting exception remediation in Minctrl auditable?

Every run start, signature and change to the process is written to a hash-chained audit log your auditor can verify and export. The example is modelled on MiFIR/EMIR; whether your process meets it is a decision for your compliance team.

Does the AI decide everything?

No. Minctrl will not make a process runnable while an irreversible step can be reached without a human gate, and one person cannot sign two gates of the same run.

More examples