Example processfinanceFDCPA/Reg F

Debt collection automation software

An example of debt collection as a governed process: agents do the 10 steps, and a person signs the gate before anything irreversible happens. Download it, import it into your workspace, and adapt it to your systems.

Download example · JSONImport into Minctrl →

minctrl.process/v1 · hash d7f5ab004ffb…1965

The graph10 agent steps1 human gatesigns: Collections manager / licensed attorney

Debt-collection / AR autopilot

Collections is high-volume, script-driven outreach gated by FDCPA / Reg F / TCPA — where one mistimed automated contact is a class-action vector. Accounts are segmented and worked with compliant, logged outreach and self-serve payment plans; only legal escalation, settlements and disputed debts reach a manager, who signs.

The governed flow · branches, parallel work & a human on the irreversible step
early-stage / current balanceserious delinquency / disputed / settlement candidatepaying / no responsedisputed in writing / cease-communication — stop collection, validate (1692g(b))settlement approvedadverse action approvedsend back for rework
Start
agent · low risk
Segment delinquent accounts, pull balances, credit-bureau data and dispute flags
agent · low risk
Send the §1006.34 validation notice in or within 5 days of the initial communication — debt itemization since the itemization date, dispute rights, original-creditor-information request right, and electronic opt-out (15 USC 1692g(a); 12 CFR 1006.34). Precondition for all downstream collection
decision
Account tier? (early-stage current-balance vs serious-delinquency / disputed / settlement-candidate)
agent · low risk
Run compliant omnichannel outreach within Reg F / TCPA limits and offer a self-serve payment plan — Reg F caps: ≤7 calls/7 days per debt, none within 7 days after a phone conversation, contact 8am-9pm local, honor medium opt-out & cease-communication (12 CFR 1006.14, 1006.6)
decision
Consumer response? (paying / no response vs disputed in writing / cease-communication — FDCPA 1692g(b) requires stopping collection until the debt is validated)
parallel · fan-out / join
Fan out independent checks on the serious / disputed account
agent · low risk
Validate the dispute and check FDCPA / FCRA / Reg F rules for this account — on a timely written dispute, cease collection until verification is obtained and mailed (15 USC 1692g(b))
agent · medium risk
Pull affordability / credit signals and size a feasible settlement or hardship plan
agent · medium risk
Merge checks and draft the legal-escalation / settlement / disputed-debt-validation / adverse-action package
gate · human sign-off
Review and sign legal escalation, settlement terms, disputed-debt validation, or adverse action (CRA furnishing / charge-off / legal referral / debt sale)signs: Collections manager / licensed attorney
decision
Manager verdict? (settlement approved vs adverse action approved vs send back for rework)
agent · medium risk
Post the approved agreed settlement / payment-plan payment via payment rails (reversible benign outcome — not the adverse path)
agent · low risk
§1006.30 pre-furnishing gate: confirm the consumer was spoken to in person/by phone, or a debt notice was mailed/sent and a reasonable period (14 consecutive days) passed with no undeliverability, before any credit-bureau furnishing (12 CFR 1006.30)
agent · high riskirreversible
Execute the approved adverse action — credit-bureau furnishing, charge-off, legal referral, or debt sale/placement (irreversible legal/credit consequences)
agent · low risk
Log every contact and outcome for compliance defense and handle FCRA disputes on furnished tradelines
Done
low riskmedium riskhigh riskbranch / reworkgate · human sign-off
What it is modelled on

Reporting a debt to a credit bureau or escalating to legal action is hard to unwind and directly affects a consumer, so a human signs off before those steps and before any deviation from the FDCPA/Reg F contact limits.

RuleWhat it requires
FDCPA / Regulation F (CFPB)Regulation F sets a call-frequency presumption of no more than 7 calls within a 7-day period per particular debt, and no call within 7 days of a conversation about that debt; it also governs communication times, places and content.
Debt validation noticeConsumers must receive the validation information / notice and, if they dispute in writing within 30 days, collection must pause until the debt is verified.
Cease-communication & FCRA furnishingA written cease-communication request must be honored, and any furnishing of debt data to a consumer reporting agency must be accurate and follow FCRA dispute-handling rules.

A summary for orientation, not legal advice.

Use this example
01

Download the file

A minctrl.process/v1 document: the graph and the hash of the process it becomes.

02

Import it in Processes

Import into Minctrl opens this example in your workspace; one click stores it as your first version. Import JSON does the same with the file, and a file changed after download is refused.

03

Connect your systems

Every connector starts in shadow: steps run, nothing leaves Minctrl until you configure a connector and switch it live.

04

Adapt it

Change signers, time limits and steps on the canvas. Each save is a new version; a running case stays on the version it started with.

Questions
How does debt collection automation stay compliant with the FDCPA and Regulation F 7-in-7 rule?

The flow tracks every contact against Regulation F's call-frequency presumption — no more than 7 calls in a 7-day period per debt, and no call within 7 days of a conversation about that debt — plus permitted times and channels. Attempts that would breach the caps are blocked, and the contact log is retained as evidence.

What happens when a consumer disputes the debt?

A written dispute within 30 days of the validation notice pauses collection on that debt until it is verified. The AI agent routes the dispute and holds outreach; a cease-communication request is honored the same way, and both are recorded with a tamper-evident audit hash.

Does the AI report to credit bureaus on its own?

No. Furnishing a debt to a consumer reporting agency, or escalating to legal action, is hard to reverse and directly affects the consumer, so it parks at a human sign-off gate. The AI clears the reversible outreach volume; a person owns the steps that hit someone's credit file.

More examples