How does the prior-authorization example handle the CMS prior-authorization rule?+
The example models what the CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (CMS-0057-F) asks of a decision: a specific denial reason, timing against the 72-hour expedited and 7-calendar-day standard windows, and a log of every determination with its evidence. Whether your organization meets the rule depends on your systems, your API obligations and your own compliance review. Minctrl holds no certification, and this is not legal advice.
How does the AI decide medical necessity without over-denying?+
The AI agent gathers the clinical documentation and codes and maps them to the plan's medical-necessity criteria, then produces a recommendation with its confidence score. It never releases a denial or a limited approval on its own — those park at a clinical sign-off gate, so a licensed reviewer owns the adverse determination.
Is the audit trail enough for an appeal or ERISA adverse-determination review?+
Every prior authorization decision is recorded with the criteria applied, the clinical evidence, the confidence, the human who signed off, and a tamper-evident audit hash. Because runs are deterministic and replayable, an appeals reviewer or auditor re-running the case gets the same result and the same rationale.